All publications
    Strategy

    Addressing National Security Concerns: What the DaVinci Platform Actually Does

    When national security is raised as an objection to navigation fee automation, it deserves a direct and technical response. Here is one.

    When civil aviation authorities evaluate navigation fee automation, national security comes up more than any other objection. It should. Airspace is sovereign territory, and the systems that manage it are critical infrastructure. Any concern raised in that context deserves direct examination, not reassurance.

    So let's examine it directly.

    What the DaVinci platform does not connect to

    DaVinci is not an Air Traffic Control system. It does not control aircraft, manage traffic, or interface with military systems. It has no integration with any government ATC, ATM, financial, ERP, or other sovereign system.

    The platform operates on a completely independent layer. It identifies airspace users, calculates navigation fees, generates invoices, collects payments, and reports to the civil aviation authority. That is the full scope of what it does.

    Because it has no access to sovereign systems, it cannot compromise them. A system with no connection to critical infrastructure cannot pose a threat to that infrastructure.

    Where the data comes from

    DaVinci is built on publicly observable data.

    ADS-B, the primary surveillance technology in civil aviation, works by having aircraft broadcast their own position, identity, and flight data openly. The signal is not encrypted or restricted. It powers the flight tracking websites accessible to anyone with a browser.

    ADS-B is one of many sources DaVinci ingests. The platform also draws on satellite surveillance data, radar feeds, flight plan filings, and other open aviation data streams. These sources are cross-referenced and processed through DaVinci's AI-augmented identification engine to account for every aircraft that enters, transits, or exits a country's airspace, including those that ADS-B alone would miss.

    No classified data is involved. No sensitive system access is required.

    What authorities gain in visibility

    Rather than creating an exposure, the platform gives civil aviation authorities something most do not currently have in a single consolidated view: real-time visibility into everything happening in their airspace.

    Through DaVinci, CAA officials can see at any moment:

    • Live aircraft count within the Flight Information Region
    • Entry and exit events as they occur
    • 24-hour traffic summaries and peak activity periods
    • Traffic mix broken down by domestic, international, and overflight
    • Trend data showing how traffic patterns are evolving over time

    This is not billing data reformatted to look like operational intelligence. It is a genuine airspace picture, built from sources that are continuously monitored and processed. The question worth asking any authority that raises security concerns: what consolidated view do you currently have of everything in your airspace right now?

    Access control stays with the authority

    The processed view inside DaVinci is not public. It is private, controlled, and exclusive to the civil aviation authority that owns it.

    The authority assigns credentials. Their officials decide who within their organisation can see what. No one outside those designated users can access the authority's airspace data through the platform.

    DaVinci does not sell, share, or otherwise transfer any authority's data to third parties, under any circumstances, for any reason.

    An authority that signs on to DaVinci does not give up data sovereignty. They get a better-organised, more accessible version of information about their own airspace, with full control over who sees it.

    What a well-founded security objection looks like

    A genuine national security concern identifies a specific vulnerability: a system that is accessed, a data source that is exposed, an operational dependency that creates risk.

    None of those exist here. If a specific technical concern does exist beyond what is covered above, it should be clearly identified so it can be addressed directly. A general reference to national security, without a specific technical basis, is not a sufficient reason to forgo the revenue that every flight crossing sovereign airspace already generates.


    Find out what your airspace is worth

    If your authority is evaluating DaVinci and would like to understand how it works in more detail, or if there is a specific concern you would like to raise, we welcome the conversation.